Relationship between herbicide use intensity and floristic diversity in smallholder rubber plantations in South Cameroon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65482/jasab2220264412-23.xKeywords:
Agroecology, Cameroon, Floristic diversity, Herbicides, Weed managementAbstract
Herbicides are frequently used in smallholder rubber plantations to manage weeds; however, their ecological impacts on floristic diversity in tropical agroecosystems are inadequately documented. That is why the relationship between herbicide use intensity and floristic diversity in smallholder rubber plantations in Niété, South Cameroon, was evaluated in this study. To achieve that purpose, a survey was administered to 100 producers. Floristic inventories were performed using 66 quadrats, including 33 in rubber plantations and 33 in adjacent fallows. Species richness, Shannon diversity, and Simpson index were calculated to compare plant communities between environments. The relationships between herbicide intensity and biodiversity indices were evaluated using Spearman analysis. Results revealed that most of the producers have an old rubber farm of 20.3 ± 12.6 years measuring 4.40 ± 3.96 ha. The average age of producers is 52.3 ± 13.7 years, and 25.5% of them are members of a producer association using an average herbicide application rate of 4.73 L/ha/year. Fallows had a higher species richness (13.4 ± 4.6 species) than plantations (10.5 ± 2.8), although the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.098). Significant negative correlations were observed between herbicide intensity and species richness, Shannon diversity, and Simpson index. PCA suggested greater floristic homogenization in plantations compared with fallows. It can be concluded that increasing herbicide use intensity was linked to poorer biodiversity indices and reduced floristic homogeneity, emphasizing the need of weed-management practices for maintaining floristic diversity in smallholder rubber agroecosystems.
References
Akhter, S., Naik, V. K., Naladi, B. J., Rathore, A., Yadav, P., and Lal, D. 2024. The ecological impact of pesticides on non-target organisms in agricultural ecosystems. Advances in Bioresearch, 4: 322–334. https://doi.org/10.15515/abr.0976-4585.15.4.322334
Altieri, M. A. 2018. Agroecology: The science of sustainable agriculture (2nd ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429495465
Ansong, M., Acheampong, E., Echeruo, J. B., Afful, S. N., and Ahimah, M. 2021. Direct financial cost of weed control in smallholder rubber plantations. Open Agriculture, 1: 346–355. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2021-0022.
Burgos R., and Ortuoste, D. 2018. Weed management in natural rubber. In N. R. Burgos, O. Duke and E. Korres (Eds.), Weed Control: Sustainability, Hazards, and Risks in Cropping Systems Worldwide (pp. 485–504). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315155913-26
Damalas A. and Eleftherohorinos G. 2011. Pesticide exposure, safety issues, and risk assessment indicators. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 5: 1402–1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8051402
Dilipkumar M., Chuah S., Goh S. and Sahid I. 2020. Weed management issues, challenges, and opportunities in Malaysia. Crop Protection, 134: 104347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.08.027
Dinoop K., Jibin P., Velayudhan P., Velayudhan P., Sidhardhan K. and Thomas S. 2026. Future outlook of rubber materials and technology. In S. Thomas, A. V. K. Abitha, K. P. Jibin, & H. J. Maria (Eds.), Rubber Technology (pp. 583–600). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823826-4.00017-0
Folke C., Carpenter S., Walker, B., Scheffer M., Elmqvist T., Gunderson L. and Holling S. 2004. Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 35: 557–581. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711
Geiger F., Bengtsson J., Berendse F., Weisser W., Emmerson M., Morales B., et al. (2010). Persistent negative effects of pesticides on biodiversity and biological control potential on European farmland. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11: 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2009.12.001
Huang Y., James K., Thamthanakoon N., Pinitjitsamut P., Rattanamanee N., Pinitjitsamut M., Yamklin S. and Lowenberg-DeBoer J. 2023. Economic outcomes of rubber-based agroforestry systems: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Agroforestry Systems, 97: 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-022-00734-x
International Rubber Study Group (IRSG). (2022). World Rubber Industry Outlook 2022. IRSG, Singapore.
IPBES 2019. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. E. S. Brondizio, J. Settele, S. Díaz, and H. T. Ngo (editors). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 1148 pages. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673
Keddy P.A. 1992. Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science, 3: 157-164. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235676
Kent M., and Coker P. 1992. Vegetation Description and Analysis: A Practical Approach. Belhaven Press, London, UK.
Magurran E. 2004. Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.
Newbold T., Hudson N., Hill L., Contu S., Lysenko, I., Senior, A., et al. 2015. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature, 520: 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14324
Perfecto I., and Vandermeer J. 2010. The agroecological matrix as alternative to the land-sparing/agriculture intensification model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107: 5786–5791. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905455107
Priyadarshan M. 2017. Technical crops. Genome Mapping and Molecular breeding in plants. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54506-6
Simpson H. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163 :688. https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0
Singh K., Liu W., Zakari S., Wu J., Yang B., Jiang X. J., et al. 2021. A global review of rubber plantations: Impacts on ecosystem functions, mitigations, future directions, and policies for sustainable cultivation. Science of the Total Environment, 796: 148948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148948
Stoate C., Baldi A., Beja P., Boatman D., Herzon I., Van Doorn A., et al. 2009. Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 91: 22–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.07.005
Tchamba N., Fondja Hendi C., Weladji B. and Etoga, G. 2015. Abondance et distribution des grands singes et des activités humaines dans le Parc National de Campo Ma’an, Sud Cameroun. Tropicultura, 33: 3–11.
Thaochan N., Pornsuriya C., Chairin T., Thoawan K., Chomnunti P., and Sunpapao A. 2025. Fungal-Infected Weeds: A Potential Source of Leaf Spot Disease in Rubber Trees from Southern Thailand. Journal of Fungi, 11: 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11030220
Tscharntke T., Clough Y., Wanger C., et al. 2012. Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biological Conservation, 151: 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.068
Wan F., Fu L., Dainese M., Kiær P., Hu. Q., Xin F., et al. 2025. Pesticides have negative effects on non-target organisms. Nature Communications, 16: 1360. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56732-x
Warren-Thomas E., Dolman M., and Edwards P. 2015. Increasing demand for natural rubber necessitates a robust sustainability initiative to mitigate impacts on tropical biodiversity. Conservation Letters, 8: 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12168
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 René MENOH A NGON, Tsouga M. MANGA, Olinga D. MBALA, Omoloko A. OMOLOKO
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal offers members open access to reach all published articles freely within the framework of “Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)” license. This license enables reusers to reproduce, share, and adapt articles in any medium or format, including for commercial purposes, so long as the attribution is given to the authors.
